Facebook Blog

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

1 week ago

Alpha Psychology

MANAGING YOUR MENTAL MESS:
YOU CAN’T RELY ON JUST ONE STRATEGY!

Some people seem to labour under the delusion that any given psychological strategy should be a panacea – a cure all, a final solution. Often clients will say to me that some strategy or method or idea just “didn’t work”. Well….no….one single thing won’t work if you are using that word to mean “I’m fixed and healed and whole and new for all time, under all circumstances, and the problem shall never return, so sayeth the Lord, Hallelujah”.

Perhaps there is an expectation that one particular technique will work because, hey, alcohol does the trick pretty well doesn’t it?! And, let’s be honest with each other here, it does do a pretty reasonable job. Yes it works to dull the senses, cloud the memories and lift the mood (temporarily). That’s why people use it, obviously. But it can have some fairly unsavory side effects too can't it? Maybe this is why we often anticipate that a single strategy will “work” because something like alcohol can “work,” medication can “work,” drugs can “work” in the broadest sense of that word.

You get a nice little buzz, a pleasant floaty feeling, a temporary reprieve without putting in much effort. And there's the rub....without much effort. It’s the kind of mentality that I imagine a hammer takes to a nail. We want something easy to just get the damn job done. But psychological strategies don’t “work” like that. We, as humans, are neither hammers nor nails. No single strategy is going to work ad infinitum. You are possibly going to get a 5% benefit to your mood from someting like healthy eating. 5%! It barely touches the sides, the improvement is almost imperceptible….damn and drats and double bummer! But it’s a start isn’t it? It’s something.

They you might decide to try sleeping more and hey presto! Whoop and yipee and by golly there’s a 15% improvement. NOW you’re getting somewhere. Now you actually FEEL a little better. Then….just for the hell of it….you decide to give that meditation stuff a go *excited face*…..for 2 days.... *are-you-serious face*! Well, shock and horror, that tiny foray into the world of meditation didn’t net you much benefit. It didn’t “work” for you supposedly. Maybe it would have “worked” if you’d given it an honest try. Maybe if you’d persisted you would have garnered a benefit….but perhaps not. Maybe it represented a possible 30% improvement, but you didn’t want to stick with it. No heat, no judgement. It just wasn’t your thing. So you start walking (another 5%), you take up a musical instrument (7%), you read a self-help book (10%), you try listening to a podcast (2%).

And then you have an awful day. Stop doing ALL of it. And you’re back to square one!

My point is that there is no single thing that is going to “work” for depression or anxiety or anger or trauma or anything else really. Some things you won’t want to do at all. Some things you won't want to do on some days. Some things will work at some times but, inexplicably, not at other times. Some things will work beautifully then ostensibly stop working entirely. This isn’t because anything is going wrong. This is merely because you’re human and evolving and changing and complex and messy. So, dear friends, the moral of the story is; don’t rely too heavily on any one, single strategy in the hopes that it’s going to see you through dark times. Develop a suite of strategies that suit your style so that you can be the well-equipped, forward-thinking, savvy, badass, psychological master that I know you can be.
... See MoreSee Less

MANAGING YOUR MENTAL MESS: 
YOU CAN’T RELY ON JUST ONE STRATEGY! 

Some people seem to labour under the delusion that any given psychological strategy should be a panacea – a cure all, a final solution. Often clients will say to me that some strategy or method or idea just “didn’t work”. Well….no….one single thing won’t work if you are using that word to mean “I’m fixed and healed and whole and new for all time, under all circumstances, and the problem shall never return, so sayeth the Lord, Hallelujah”. 

Perhaps there is an expectation that one particular technique will work because, hey, alcohol does the trick pretty well doesn’t it?!  And, let’s be honest with each other here, it does do a pretty reasonable job. Yes it works to dull the senses, cloud the memories and lift the mood (temporarily). That’s why people use it, obviously. But it can have some fairly unsavory side effects too cant it? Maybe this is why we often anticipate that a single strategy will “work” because something like alcohol can “work,” medication can “work,” drugs can “work” in the broadest sense of that word.

You get a nice little buzz, a pleasant floaty feeling, a temporary reprieve without putting in much effort. And theres the rub....without much effort. It’s the kind of mentality that I imagine a hammer takes to a nail. We want something easy to just get the damn job done. But psychological strategies don’t “work” like that.  We, as humans, are neither hammers nor nails. No single strategy is going to work ad infinitum. You are possibly going to get a 5% benefit to your mood from someting like healthy eating. 5%! It barely touches the sides, the improvement is almost imperceptible….damn and drats and double bummer! But it’s a start isn’t it? It’s something. 

They you might decide to try sleeping more and hey presto! Whoop and yipee and by golly there’s a 15% improvement. NOW you’re getting somewhere. Now you actually FEEL a little better. Then….just for the hell of it….you decide to give that meditation stuff a go *excited face*…..for 2 days.... *are-you-serious face*! Well, shock and horror, that tiny foray into the world of meditation didn’t net you much benefit. It didn’t “work” for you supposedly. Maybe it would have “worked” if you’d given it an honest try. Maybe if you’d persisted you would have garnered a benefit….but perhaps not. Maybe it represented a possible 30% improvement, but you didn’t want to stick with it. No heat, no judgement. It just wasn’t your thing. So you start walking (another 5%), you take up a musical instrument (7%), you read a self-help book (10%), you try listening to a podcast (2%). 

And then you have an awful day. Stop doing ALL of it.  And you’re back to square one! 

My point is that there is no single thing that is going to “work” for depression or anxiety or anger or trauma or anything else really. Some things you won’t want to do at all. Some things you wont want to do on some days. Some things will work at some times but, inexplicably, not at other times. Some things will work beautifully then ostensibly stop working entirely. This isn’t because anything is going wrong. This is merely because you’re human and evolving and changing and complex and messy. So, dear friends, the moral of the story is; don’t rely too heavily on any one, single strategy in the hopes that it’s going to see you through dark times. Develop a suite of strategies that suit your style so that you can be the well-equipped, forward-thinking, savvy, badass, psychological master that I know you can be.

Comment on Facebook

Granny used to say, "wash your face and polish your shoes, then have a cuppa, THEN look at things again". Never did any harm and at least I had clean shoes to show for it!☺

We must realize that we must evolve with the diseases in order to overcome them - whether it is a only mental state or not, it at least thinks it is alive - or we do 🤔. Perpetuating, or putting things in motion is what our brains do... check it out.

Be greatful just to be alive, unless in terrible pain

Forfeit all strategies Be humbled Be grateful Be joyous Breath in Fresh air Breath out The chicken shit They are trying To sell you

1 month ago

Alpha Psychology

'SELF-LOVE' AND ALL THAT GUFF.

I’m not sure that I completely agree with this “self-worth,” “self-love” malarkey that has recently saturated our Western consciousness. Don’t all pile-on here….I understand the essence of what’s being communicated when somebody says “I need to have more self-worth”…..I get it…. and on one level I completely agree. We would all do well to have a healthy level of self-esteem but, as with most things these days, I think we’ve lost a bit of nuance in this discussion.

Sometimes the idea that people conjure up in their imagination when they think “self-love” is something approximating narcissism. For some people “self-worth” ends up meaning arrogance in drag. Here’s the thing, genuine self-worth doesn’t feel like much of anything really. It’s a very subtle, teeny feeling when it’s compared to all the other feelings on the palate. It’s bland, it’s subdued, it’s like that nude-tanish-peach colour. It’s actually kinda blah as a feeling. And rightly so to my mind.

I would argue that anybody who feels a strong sense of self-love might be caught in an ego trap of their own making. When genuine confidence is interwoven with modesty and generosity of spirit towards other people then it manifests simply as a sense of groundedness and surety within the psyche. It’s just a quiet knowing that you are kinda alright. Not a bad egg. A pretty good chap. Nothing more. Nothing less.
The reason I take issue with pushing the idea of self-love onto unsophisticated and unrefined minds is that it will inevitably become incorporated at an ego level. It runs the risk of being used as fuel for the fires of pride and unkindness. And I think we are seeing some of that playout in our culture right now. “I should love myself” people will say to me. “Why? What do you think that means?” I’ll rebut. We are in the throes of a culture where everybody is an armchair psychiatrist and will quite happily bandy around the word ‘narcissist’ in reference to their ex-partner or their mother-in-law who, in reality, is merely selfish or impolite or (God forbid) thinking of themselves. While we simultaneously encourage every Tom, Dick and Nancy to love themselves. It’s a complete head-fudge! You can’t have it both ways. Should we try to love ourselves or should we avoid narcissism? Pick one!

I think the reason we are in this conundrum (which actually isn’t a conundrum at all) is because we are using these words in a lazy and sloppy way without truly understanding them. For whatever it is worth, I suggest that you DON’T try to love yourself. That is a convoluted, confusing assignment to give to the mind. Don’t go hunting for some fantasmagorical (Best. Word. Eva.) FEELING like self-love as if it’s the Holy Grail because, just like the Grail, it’s a legend! It’s a myth. It’s not an actual-real-tangible thing. It’s the finger that points to the moon – not the moon itself.

Just be who you are at this particular moment in time. Let me say that again because it’s easy to miss the profundity of that one….JUST BE WHO YOU ARE…beautiful, talented, ridiculous, messy, terrible, wonderful person that you are. Just be that! Don’t try to love yourself but don’t hate yourself either. Just honour your humanity. Be where you are right now. Be who you are right now. That is where your value lies.

If you want to give yourself an assignment because, let’s face it, we Seeker-Healer types are inclined to do that, just try to be the best version of yourself that you can be as often as you can be. Not perfect….pfft, perfect would be sooooo boring…just try your best. When you fail – cos you for sure, guaranteed will – don’t sweat it. It’s doesn’t matter. Trust me on this one, it doesn’t. No matter how awful you believe your failings to be, you are still a pretty cool chick. Regardless of what your faults may be you are still a pretty groovy guy. Honestly you are! When you let this sink into your bones and live in your soul then, and only then, when you least expect it, when you’re not looking, will that gentle-unassuming-quiet flower that is self-worth bloom for you.
... See MoreSee Less

SELF-LOVE AND ALL THAT GUFF. 

I’m not sure that I completely agree with this “self-worth,” “self-love” malarkey that has recently saturated our Western consciousness. Don’t all pile-on here….I understand the essence of what’s being communicated when somebody says “I need to have more self-worth”…..I get it…. and on one level I completely agree. We would all do well to have a healthy level of self-esteem but, as with most things these days, I think we’ve lost a bit of nuance in this discussion. 

Sometimes the idea that people conjure up in their imagination when they think “self-love” is something approximating narcissism. For some people “self-worth” ends up meaning arrogance in drag. Here’s the thing, genuine self-worth doesn’t feel like much of anything really. It’s a very subtle, teeny feeling when it’s compared to all the other feelings on the palate. It’s bland, it’s subdued, it’s like that nude-tanish-peach colour. It’s actually kinda blah as a feeling. And rightly so to my mind. 

I would argue that anybody who feels a strong sense of self-love might be caught in an ego trap of their own making. When genuine confidence is interwoven with modesty and generosity of spirit towards other people then it manifests simply as a sense of groundedness and surety within the psyche. It’s just a quiet knowing that you are kinda alright. Not a bad egg. A pretty good chap. Nothing more. Nothing less. 
The reason I take issue with pushing the idea of self-love onto unsophisticated and unrefined minds is that it will inevitably become incorporated at an ego level. It runs the risk of being used as fuel for the fires of pride and unkindness. And I think we are seeing some of that playout in our culture right now.  “I should love myself” people will say to me. “Why? What do you think that means?” I’ll rebut. We are in the throes of a culture where everybody is an armchair psychiatrist and will quite happily bandy around the word ‘narcissist’ in reference to their ex-partner or their mother-in-law who, in reality, is merely selfish or impolite or (God forbid) thinking of themselves. While we simultaneously encourage every Tom, Dick and Nancy to love themselves. It’s a complete head-fudge! You can’t have it both ways. Should we try to love ourselves or should we avoid narcissism? Pick one!

I think the reason we are in this conundrum (which actually isn’t a conundrum at all) is because we are using these words in a lazy and sloppy way without truly understanding them. For whatever it is worth, I suggest that you DON’T try to love yourself. That is a convoluted, confusing assignment to give to the mind. Don’t go hunting for some fantasmagorical (Best. Word. Eva.) FEELING like self-love as if it’s the Holy Grail because, just like the Grail, it’s a legend! It’s a myth. It’s not an actual-real-tangible thing. It’s the finger that points to the moon – not the moon itself. 

Just be who you are at this particular moment in time. Let me say that again because it’s easy to miss the profundity of that one….JUST BE WHO YOU ARE…beautiful, talented, ridiculous, messy, terrible, wonderful person that you are. Just be that! Don’t try to love yourself but don’t hate yourself either. Just honour your humanity. Be where you are right now. Be who you are right now. That is where your value lies. 

If you want to give yourself an assignment because, let’s face it, we Seeker-Healer types are inclined to do that, just try to be the best version of yourself that you can be as often as you can be. Not perfect….pfft, perfect would be sooooo boring…just try your best. When you fail – cos you for sure, guaranteed will – don’t sweat it. It’s doesn’t matter. Trust me on this one, it doesn’t. No matter how awful you believe your failings to be, you are still a pretty cool chick. Regardless of what your faults may be you are still a pretty groovy guy. Honestly you are! When you let this sink into your bones and live in your soul then, and only then, when you least expect it, when you’re not looking, will that gentle-unassuming-quiet flower that is self-worth bloom for you.

Comment on Facebook

A very good read. Thanks.

Thank you for helping me bring my subconscious feelings into my conscious mind! I have also fallen victim to the ''love yourself'' trend ,thanks to society!!!! I've always known it's enough just toa ccept and like yourself (your relationship with yourself is different to your relationshipo with others, )I have struggled so hard to love myself, but after a while it felt narcissistic! it's like living in abubble where you're separated fom others. You love others, help them ,etc. not be absorbed in yourself, and you just have to accept yourself, to be confident and practical1!!!!!

"I think we’ve lost a bit of nuance in this discussion" I've lost track of the times i've said this over the last ten years in every aspect of human discourse.

Self Love should be standing by your beliefs or standing up for one's self!👍 Many times you should put Self first!💯 I hope you agree & I like that you put forward there is difference between Selfishness & Manipulation!🙏

When your heart is open yet you remain detached from expectaion your light shines ..and that is enough

I cannot like this enough. Beautifully said.

An interesting read because he says it like it really is....simples!

I’m far too busy being responsible for making ends meet for myself and my family. Fact of the matter is, self loving is filled with narcissism and arrogance. I won’t have time for that nonsense!

In our day we were to busy getting on with our lives to bother with bullshit

Love it. Spot on.

Nicely put but self love isnt selfish, being a narcissist has nothing to do with love or confidence, it is built on an entirely different premise. You have confined love to a pin point narrative and it is certainly not that. Self love is a platform to understanding that the love you give others, what you do for those you love, the care that you give them and the compassion that you have for them, should be at least reflected back onto yourself. Without honouring the self and having an awareness of your value, you allow yourself to accept less, be less and expect less. I think of it this way ... think of something that you love.... why do love it ? When you know that... you know it's value, how wonderful it can be and knowing that, what would you do to take care of it, to fix it when its broken to heal it, when its sick. Love isnt ever selfish and neither is love for self , it simply means that you know your value, you give yourself the same care, compassion, kindness that you give other .... because you are worth it.

Self love is the precurser to loving others ...for Narcissists self love is the overwhelming reason for manipulating others ..love has no positive role to.play here only maloevolent 😥😥😥

Nailed it.

Interesting.

View more comments

1 month ago

Alpha Psychology

Of course walking away from an angry person makes them angrier! That doesn't mean you shouldn't protect yourself and walk away. ... See MoreSee Less

1 month ago

Alpha Psychology

HOW ABOUT A LITTLE BIT OF ADVICE FOR MEN

There is a plethora, a myriad, a mass, a cornucopia, a googolplex (ok ok I’m being silly, I’ll stop) of relationship advice available to women; for women, from women. Much of this advice is incredibly helpful, timely and accurate. This is, without a doubt, a very good thing indeed because – let’s face it – women, within the context of a relationship, can be utterly and completely diabolical (picture Cruella de Ville meets that murderous woman from Fatal Attraction). Women have the potential to be maniacal and malevolent and this can be especially true within intimate relationships. So sure! Thank you world! Pelt us with relationship advice. Let us marinate in the wisdom of Layla Martin, Iyanla Vanzant, Ester Perel (and many dozens more). Lavish the female of the species, who can be prone to bouts of insanity, with all the self-actualising-enlightenment-happily-ever-after information that she can handle. Bring it on baby.

BUT!!!!! I kinda take issue with the way that the conversation can be somewhat lopsided. Even within a space where women are counselling and mentoring other women about their relationship etiquette there is a decidedly masculine bent to the advice. Women should speak clearly and calmly to “their man” says one. Women would do well to “give him space when he needs it and be nothing but chill about it sista” twitters another. If you want a husband “speak to him when he’s ready for it and not stressed from work” says another. I understand the spirit of this advice. Remember, I’m not arguing with the basic fact that some women can be a red-hot mess in relationships. This rhetoric, while actually completely and utterly helpful on the surface, leaves me a little unnerved because that’s not the full and complete story – the truth and nothing but the truth so help me God.

As I’ve said…of course women can use all the help they can get within their intimate partnerships. And many women, by the way, seek out this information voluntarily. Yay the sisterhood! But our current relationship ills surely aren’t helped by intimating that women should be a little bit more Stepford-wife-ish:

“Just settle down there darling and he will hear what you’re saying better”

“Speak his language my dear”

Well ok. Yes. But….Isn’t there a danger in this overly simplified prescription that women simply be more rational, measured and calm. Be more like a man essentially, so that the man can understand you. If women would do well to practice their masculine traits; such as stoicism and logic and stiff-upper-lip-edness how about we encourage our MEN to at least do the same. Be stronger and more stoic when dealing with their female partners? If she is emotionally overwhelmed and unable to articulate her feelings rationally in any given moment which – I’m sorry to be very politically incorrect here – can be what women are like sometimes, how about our men step-up and exercise their patience and fortitude? Heaven forbid that he read a relationship book or he attend a relationship seminar. Guys, explain how you feel lovingly and empathetically without needing her to remind you or encourage you or hold your hand. Nurture her soul and tend to her heart without her prompting you. Don’t let her do the lion’s (or should I say lionesses) share of the relationship work. Lead in your relationship fellas!

It does neither sex any good to let the relationship conversation become unbalanced and lacking nuance. It’s not as simple as blunting women’s femininity, dampening her emotional nature in favour of logic and intellect. Of course women bring their personal brand of crazy into romantic unions and any human, male or female, would do well to be reasonable and balanced. But let’s not throw this particular sensitive, emotion-centered baby out with the bathwater. Women can be encouraged to be women without giving her licence to be a screeching harpy. The sacred goddess, the divine mother, Aphrodite, Athena, Cinderella – these are our myths ladies. My question is why can’t we encourage and/or teach men to hold space for this messy, sassy, sexy, delicate, irrational, sensitive creature. Are you men or are you mice?

Men could help their beloved to grow and heal and relax by creating a safe space for her to be a WOMAN. I think that some relationship experts can unwittingly and subtly imply that women become more masculine in order to relate to their male counterparts better - not that that’s not sound advice to an extent, because it is –there is just another side to that story which isn’t being told very often. The crux of that chapter is for men to step up. Don’t be the guy who needs his woman to be contained. Don’t be the dude who shrinks and shrivels from deep conversation or hard emotions. Be strong enough to bear witness to feminine pain and anguish sometimes. Be bold and brave enough to handle all of her. She will do her part – ladies, are you listening to me? She will do her part - by making every effort to not go scary Single White Female on you. But in return….you do your part!
... See MoreSee Less

HOW ABOUT A LITTLE BIT OF ADVICE FOR MEN 

There is a plethora, a myriad, a mass, a cornucopia, a googolplex (ok ok I’m being silly, I’ll stop) of relationship advice available to women; for women, from women. Much of this advice is incredibly helpful, timely and accurate. This is, without a doubt, a very good thing indeed because – let’s face it – women, within the context of a relationship, can be utterly and completely diabolical (picture Cruella de Ville meets that murderous woman from Fatal Attraction). Women have the potential to be maniacal and malevolent and this can be especially true within intimate relationships. So sure! Thank you world! Pelt us with relationship advice. Let us marinate in the wisdom of Layla Martin, Iyanla Vanzant, Ester Perel (and many dozens more). Lavish the female of the species, who can be prone to bouts of insanity, with all the self-actualising-enlightenment-happily-ever-after information that she can handle. Bring it on baby. 

BUT!!!!! I kinda take issue with the way that the conversation can be somewhat lopsided. Even within a space where women are counselling and mentoring other women about their relationship etiquette there is a decidedly masculine bent to the advice. Women should speak clearly and calmly to “their man” says one. Women would do well to “give him space when he needs it and be nothing but chill about it sista” twitters another. If you want a husband “speak to him when he’s ready for it and not stressed from work” says another. I understand the spirit of this advice. Remember, I’m not arguing with the basic fact that some women can be a red-hot mess in relationships. This rhetoric, while actually completely and utterly helpful on the surface, leaves me a little unnerved because that’s not the full and complete story – the truth and nothing but the truth so help me God. 

As I’ve said…of course women can use all the help they can get within their intimate partnerships. And many women, by the way, seek out this information voluntarily. Yay the sisterhood! But our current relationship ills surely aren’t helped by intimating that women should be a little bit more Stepford-wife-ish: 

“Just settle down there darling and he will hear what you’re saying better” 

“Speak his language my dear” 

Well ok. Yes. But….Isn’t there a danger in this overly simplified prescription that women simply be more rational, measured and calm. Be more like a man essentially, so that the man can understand you. If women would do well to practice their masculine traits; such as stoicism and logic and stiff-upper-lip-edness how about we encourage our MEN to at least do the same. Be stronger and more stoic when dealing with their female partners? If she is emotionally overwhelmed and unable to articulate her feelings rationally in any given moment which – I’m sorry to be very politically incorrect here – can be what women are like sometimes, how about our men step-up and exercise their patience and fortitude? Heaven forbid that he read a relationship book or he attend a relationship seminar. Guys, explain how you feel lovingly and empathetically without needing her to remind you or encourage you or hold your hand. Nurture her soul and tend to her heart without her prompting you. Don’t let her do the lion’s (or should I say lionesses) share of the relationship work. Lead in your relationship fellas!  

It does neither sex any good to let the relationship conversation become unbalanced and lacking nuance. It’s not as simple as blunting women’s femininity, dampening her emotional nature in favour of logic and intellect. Of course women bring their personal brand of crazy into romantic unions and any human, male or female, would do well to be reasonable and balanced. But let’s not throw this particular sensitive, emotion-centered baby out with the bathwater. Women can be encouraged to be women without giving her licence to be a screeching harpy. The sacred goddess, the divine mother, Aphrodite, Athena, Cinderella – these are our myths ladies. My question is why can’t we encourage and/or teach men to hold space for this messy, sassy, sexy, delicate, irrational, sensitive creature. Are you men or are you mice? 

Men could help their beloved to grow and heal and relax by creating a safe space for her to be a WOMAN. I think that some relationship experts can unwittingly and subtly imply that women become more masculine in order to relate to their male counterparts better - not that that’s not sound advice to an extent, because it is –there is just another side to that story which isn’t being told very often. The crux of that chapter is for men to step up. Don’t be the guy who needs his woman to be contained. Don’t be the dude who shrinks and shrivels from deep conversation or hard emotions. Be strong enough to bear witness to feminine pain and anguish sometimes. Be bold and brave enough to handle all of her. She will do her part – ladies, are you listening to me? She will do her part - by making every effort to not go scary Single White Female on you. But in return….you do your part!

Comment on Facebook

You know why they don't give advice to men... because they don't listen to advice! They don't listen full stop! Even if they listened they'd still do what they were going to do or not going to do. Most of them only read instructions after they've already tried to do something and have done it wrong. Before you tear me to pieces... I'm not a man hater, but it is true. 🤣😁😅😜

The best thing a woman can say to her guy: "You look stressed/tired/great. Can I get you a beer sweetie?"

Gay

Taken me 6 days to read this shit. Forgot what to say

Women are evil. You don't need to look to hard to see that.

View more comments

1 month ago

Alpha Psychology

If you are making stupid choices and want things to change merely try to stop. If you’re not ready, don’t try right now. That’s it. There is no need to judge yourself beyond that. ... See MoreSee Less

1 month ago

Alpha Psychology

LOVE SHOULD BE HARD CORE, NOT FACILE AND IMPOTENT!

Love is one of those words that gets thrown around so much that it can be hard to even know what any given individual means when those four little letters pass through their lips. Some people seem to mean lust. Some people apparently mean devotion. Some people ostensibly mean friendship. Some people even appear to mean obsession. Some people may mean infatuation. Maybe love can be all of these things. Perhaps it should mean none of them. I don’t know.

What I do know is that it’s one of those gummy words that you can roll around in your mind…stretching it and chewing on it…and end up with no more clarity that when you first started. It’s a loaded, confusing, multi-faceted word, just like the word God or forgiveness or truth. Poets, artists, novelists, sculptors, playwrights and lyricists have been encountering this quandry since time immemorial.

There’s one thing that seems to be painfully obvious about our modern culture. I think we have trivialised and maybe even traumatised this delicate little word to the point that she’s battered and bruised. We betray and squander her. We weaponise and devalue her.

In this fast-paced-low-stakes age of pop-up shops, uber eats, ONS, ghosting and cancel culture we’ve lost something important. Something intangible and ineffable. Something significant and potent. Not that I’m against pop-up shops, uber eats or even ONS (they’re all fine and dandy). Love just doesn’t seem to me to be very hard core anymore. We profess to love one another and tap out anyway. We profess to love one other another and hit anyway. We profess to love one another and betray anyway.

Ostensibly the gravitas of this word isn’t much pondered. This beatific, darling of a word is desecrated when it is used to reference or excuse weak and facile behaviour. Love is supposedly patient and kind….yes…but it is absolutely not weak. Love should be strong. Love is sticking in when the fit hits the shan. Love doesn’t run at the first sign of trouble. Love signs up for trouble, without naivety, without rose-coloured glasses, love says “yes” even when her eyes are wide open.

“I think that is what you do when you love someone deeply, you decide at the deepest level of your being that for all the fragility, inadequacy and error of that particular person it’s spectacularly wonderful that they exist” – Jordan Peterson
... See MoreSee Less

LOVE SHOULD BE HARD CORE, NOT FACILE AND IMPOTENT! 

Love is one of those words that gets thrown around so much that it can be hard to even know what any given individual means when those four little letters pass through their lips. Some people seem to mean lust. Some people apparently mean devotion. Some people ostensibly mean friendship. Some people even appear to mean obsession.  Some people may mean infatuation.  Maybe love can be all of these things. Perhaps it should mean none of them. I don’t know. 

What I do know is that it’s one of those gummy words that you can roll around in your mind…stretching it and chewing on it…and end up with no more clarity that when you first started. It’s a loaded, confusing, multi-faceted word, just like the word God or forgiveness or truth. Poets, artists, novelists, sculptors, playwrights and lyricists have been encountering this quandry since time immemorial. 

There’s one thing that seems to be painfully obvious about our modern culture. I think we have trivialised and maybe even traumatised this delicate little word to the point that she’s battered and bruised. We betray and squander her. We weaponise and devalue her. 

In this fast-paced-low-stakes age of pop-up shops, uber eats, ONS, ghosting  and cancel culture we’ve lost something important. Something intangible and ineffable. Something significant and potent. Not that I’m against pop-up shops, uber eats or even ONS (they’re all fine and dandy). Love just doesn’t seem to me to be very hard core anymore. We profess to love one another and tap out anyway. We profess to love one other another and hit anyway. We profess to love one another and betray anyway. 

Ostensibly the gravitas of this word isn’t much pondered. This beatific, darling of a word is desecrated when it is used to reference or excuse weak and facile behaviour. Love is supposedly patient and kind….yes…but it is absolutely not weak. Love should be strong. Love is sticking in when the fit hits the shan. Love doesn’t run at the first sign of trouble. Love signs up for trouble, without naivety, without rose-coloured glasses, love says “yes” even when her eyes are wide open.
 
“I think that is what you do when you love someone deeply, you decide at the deepest level of your being that for all the fragility, inadequacy and error of that particular person it’s spectacularly wonderful that they exist” – Jordan Peterson

Comment on Facebook

A shock this is from Jordan Peterson. His attitudes to sex-based psychology, and by that I mean gender determinism, are Neanderthal. But it's good to reminded that nobody is all one colour. I enjoyed the quote. Still wouldn't trust the alt-right darling as far as I could throw him, but.

Definitely. It is bandied about far too much.

May as well just read 1 Corinthians 13...

So sad so many did not return

Love note change but our lifetimes have changed one minute we are born and next minute we in love and next minute we are in heaven thinks yours

Thank you for sharing this. It deserves to be read.

View more comments

1 month ago

Alpha Psychology

Couples can be so addicted to melodrama within their relationships that they ostensibly confect problems just for the ego-rush ... See MoreSee Less

3 months ago

Alpha Psychology

YOU SHOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING

I’m not entirely sure why, but the notion that “you should have said something” when another person is being argumentative or provocative is an awfully popular one. It’s up there with other generic platitudes such as “just get over it” and “I’m sure it will be fine”. The question that I’m left puzzling is - why? Why should you respond when an obstinate person is rumbling for a fight with you? Maybe it’s a throwback to our gladiatorial days (…probably not), perhaps it a relic of the corporatisation and masculinisation of the West (…who knows, just spit balling here) whatever the reason, the idea that debate and verbal tete-a-tete is always ideal is patently absurd.

Let’s start with the obvious….often you don’t reply to someone with what you “should have said” because it’s downright rude and obnoxious. Now, don’t mistake me here, I’m the last person to advocate for blanket niceties. It’s not a virtue to simply bite your tongue when you could formulate a diplomatic but assertive reply to someone. But let’s not pretend that what most people mean when they pull you aside and counsel you, in a hushed voice, “you know you really should say something” is diplomacy. What they actually mean is “you should have given that person a piece of your mind and let ME be the one with a front row seat” while the blood splatters and the sweat flies. Many people want to live vicariously through the melodrama of others and if they can egg you into an entertaining battle, while they enjoy all the titillating and salacious benefits with none of the risk, then they’ll slip the knife into your hand and nudge you onto the battlefield themselves.

Which leads us to my second point; it’s often supremely unwise to lumber into an argument with somebody under the guise of “saying something” when you’re not well versed in assertiveness. By their very nature anyone who’s rumbling for a fight is likely to be unsympathetic to your position, lacking in basic manners, full of their own self-importance and low on empathy. It should go without saying that any person who will race you into an argument is probably the last person to bring patience and understanding along with them. So when you try to cordially offer an observation “you know you might consider speaking more politely to little Johnny, you’d perhaps get a better response” you might be met with fire and fury “oh, so you’re the expert now are you? You always stick your nose in! How about you keep your opinions to yourself for once.” Not only have you not achieved anything by “saying something” you’ve stumbled into an arena for which you’re ill prepared. You will invariably be left reeling from the verbal thrust and parry while gaining very little.

Some people don’t want to meet you in a mature, respectful discussion. Actually…now that I’m thinking about it…MANY people don’t even know HOW to disagree with decency even if they wanted to (which they often don’t). So if somebody has demonstrated themselves to be a poor collaborator and quick to anger then it seems like the onus is on YOU to stop expecting them to interact calmly. Having said that, I would always qualify that position by saying; if you WANT to speak your mind then you have every right to do so of course, but a degree of caution and wisdom should be mandatory. And this is often why peacemakers and quiet types don’t want to bother with a fruitless disagreement that is going to go off into the weeds in 2 seconds flat.

Which brings me to my third and final point; it often runs counter to the peacemaking impulse of many to “say something” because many discerning people simply don’t want the bother and hassle of unnecessary conflict with a hostile interlocutor. That is NOT weakness! Actually, to my mind, it is a mark of great strength. Granted that some conflict is necessary and an inability to be assertive is definitely problematic. Nevertheless, making a clear and confident decision for oneself about avoiding conflict – if done with authenticity and clarity – should be respected and honoured.
... See MoreSee Less

YOU SHOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING

I’m not entirely sure why, but the notion that “you should have said something” when another person is being argumentative or provocative is an awfully popular one. It’s up there with other generic platitudes such as “just get over it” and “I’m sure it will be fine”. The question that I’m left puzzling is - why? Why should you respond when an obstinate person is rumbling for a fight with you? Maybe it’s a throwback to our gladiatorial days (…probably not), perhaps it a relic of the corporatisation and masculinisation of the West (…who knows, just spit balling here) whatever the reason, the idea that debate and verbal tete-a-tete is always ideal is patently absurd.  

Let’s start with the obvious….often you don’t reply to someone with what you “should have said” because it’s downright rude and obnoxious. Now, don’t mistake me here, I’m the last person to advocate for blanket niceties. It’s not a virtue to simply bite your tongue when you could formulate a diplomatic but assertive reply to someone. But let’s not pretend that what most people mean when they pull you aside and counsel you, in a hushed voice, “you know you really should say something” is diplomacy. What they actually mean is “you should have given that person a piece of your mind and let ME be the one with a front row seat” while the blood splatters and the sweat flies. Many people want to live vicariously through the melodrama of others and if they can egg you into an entertaining battle, while they enjoy all the titillating and salacious benefits with none of the risk, then they’ll slip the knife into your hand and nudge you onto the battlefield themselves.    

Which leads us to my second point; it’s often supremely unwise to lumber into an argument with somebody under the guise of “saying something” when you’re not well versed in assertiveness. By their very nature anyone who’s rumbling for a fight is likely to be unsympathetic to your position, lacking in basic manners, full of their own self-importance and low on empathy. It should go without saying that any person who will race you into an argument is probably the last person to bring patience and understanding along with them. So when you try to cordially offer an observation “you know you might consider speaking more politely to little Johnny, you’d perhaps get a better response” you might be met with fire and fury “oh, so you’re the expert now are you? You always stick your nose in! How about you keep your opinions to yourself for once.” Not only have you not achieved anything by “saying something” you’ve stumbled into an arena for which you’re ill prepared. You will invariably be left reeling from the verbal thrust and parry while gaining very little.   

Some people don’t want to meet you in a mature, respectful discussion. Actually…now that I’m thinking about it…MANY people don’t even know HOW to disagree with decency even if they wanted to (which they often don’t). So if somebody has demonstrated themselves to be a poor collaborator and quick to anger then it seems like the onus is on YOU to stop expecting them to interact calmly. Having said that, I would always qualify that position by saying; if you WANT to speak your mind then you have every right to do so of course, but a degree of caution and wisdom should be mandatory. And this is often why peacemakers and quiet types don’t want to bother with a fruitless disagreement that is going to go off into the weeds in 2 seconds flat.  

Which brings me to my third and final point; it often runs counter to the peacemaking impulse of many to “say something” because many discerning people simply don’t want the bother and hassle of unnecessary conflict with a hostile interlocutor. That is NOT weakness! Actually, to my mind, it is a mark of great strength. Granted that some conflict is necessary and an inability to be assertive is definitely problematic. Nevertheless, making a clear and confident decision for oneself about avoiding conflict – if done with authenticity and clarity – should be respected and honoured.

Comment on Facebook

Another way of looking at it is that you could have said "something" sooner, to avoid the conflict in the first place.

The more you say to a verbal attack the more ammunition you give the attaker...I do t respond to attackers either in person or online...I dont need to justify myself to anyone anymore 👍👍👍

You will never win an argument when you are called a liar

After reading the parade of words I make “ a clear and confident decision “ I will NOT avoid conflict Since Like itself is “conflict “, “ I am contradiction “, Either I make a stand Or live life As a dead ghost

YOU SHOULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING... MEANINGFUL!

Make allegations of physical and verbal violence directed at a female the filth threaten with legal action & financial compensation.😃

you should be charged with inciting hate speach and you offended me so 2 charges for the law court wherre you can get a 40% discount for an early admission of guilty 🙂 lol

No one can stand your houseless employed nation and no one can go out now without being repulsed by this who're house nation's alien infestation if you don't buy homes so we can leave you will not really be showing your faces anyplace now go eat your brown bag n box

I don't want to win an argument, all I want is 2 people able to talk to each other and listen to each others point of view, if u disagree wait until that person's finished, then quietly but firmly say why u feel insulted and how u feel now, hard as hell to do but can be done, give some space and then calmly say what u need to say, if that doesn't work then u R in big trouble in relationship!

View more comments